Much security is procedurally driven. This type of approach can often be optimised using automation, e.g. at 9:00 the front door is unlocked; in the event of fire, all doors are unlocked. By building on simple basic premises, it is becoming possible to create complex policies that address situations which, up until now, are often left to frontline workers. For example, the detection of a group gathering by the perimeter, can result in the relevant emergency services being alerted. Staff can be informed, via mobile messaging or public communication systems, to make their way to a specific exit or meeting point. They can even be tracked so that doors are sealed as they progress through the building, ensuring their security. Sounds good, doesn’t it? But who decides the criteria and is there the capability to recover if things do not go according to plan? This webinar will discuss:

What is the potential of automated security to improve practice?
How geared up are security personnel to provide for agiler security?
What are the drawbacks and barriers to further developments in this area?

Panellists:
Linda Howson – R&D: Future Security Solutions at Nedap (Netherlands)
Daniel Eborall – Director Global Business Development at IREX.ai (UK)
Roberto Manunta – Strategy and Security Advisor at Manunta Consulting (UK, Spain, Italy and Cyprus)

A video and summary of this session is available here: https://www.theospas.com/2021/03/31/agile-security-and-anticipating-the-unknown-how-good-is-the-technology-and-what-are-its-limits/

Sign up to the Security & Risk Thought Leadership Newsletter and Event Updates